Logic and Divine Simplicity

Philosophy Compass 6 (4):282-294 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper surveys two contrasting views of first‐order analyses of classical theistic doctrines about the existence and nature of God. On the first view, first‐order logic provides methods for the adequate analysis of these doctrines, for example by construing ‘God’ as a singular term or as a monadic predicate, or by taking it to be a definite description. On the second view, such analyses are conceptually inadequate, at least when the doctrines in question are viewed against the background of classical theism’s doctrine of divine simplicity, for first‐order analyses presuppose an ontological complexity on the part of the propositions which they analyze, which fits ill with this doctrine.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-31

Downloads
224 (#118,584)

6 months
16 (#159,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Divine Simplicity and Modal Collapse: A Persistent Problem.Ryan Mullins & Shannon Byrd - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (1):21-52.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Summa Theologica.Thomasn D. Aquinas - 1273 - Hayes Barton Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
Mathematical logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1951 - Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.
Does God Have a Nature?Alvin Plantinga - 1980 - Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik.D. Hilbert & W. Ackermann - 1928 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 7:157-157.
Frege Reader.Michael Beaney (ed.) - 1997 - Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.

View all 22 references / Add more references