- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Brain states matter. A reply to the unfolding argument
Consciousness and Cognition 85:102981 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Refuting the unfolding-argument on the irrelevance of causal structure to consciousness.Marius Usher - 2021 - Consciousness and Cognition 95 (C):103212.
The timing of brain events: Authors’ response to Libet’s ‘Reply’.David A. Oakley & Patrick Haggard - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (3):548-550.
The unfolding argument: Why IIT and other causal structure theories cannot explain consciousness.Adrien Doerig, Aaron Schurger, Kathryn Hess & Michael H. Herzog - 2019 - Consciousness and Cognition 72:49-59.
First-person experience cannot rescue causal structure theories from the unfolding argument.Michael H. Herzog, Aaron Schurger & Adrien Doerig - 2022 - Consciousness and Cognition 98:103261.
Reply to Bruce Mangan's Commentary on “What Feeling Is the 'Feeling of Knowing?'”.Steven Ravett Brown - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (4):545-549.
Memory, consciousness, and the brain.Gianfranco Dalla Barba - 2000 - Brain and Cognition 42 (1):20-22.
Is Higher-Order Misrepresentation Empirically Plausible? An Argument From Corruption.Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:804896.
Reply to commentary by Moore and Haggard.Lars Hall, Petter Johansson, Sverker Sikström, Betty Tärning & Andreas Lind - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):697-699.
Making consciousness safe for neuroscience.Andrew Brook - 2005 - In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 397.
Timing of conscious experience: Reply to the 2002 commentaries on Libet’s findings.Benjamin Libet - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):321-331.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-09-25
Downloads
36 (#624,854)
6 months
7 (#698,214)
2020-09-25
Downloads
36 (#624,854)
6 months
7 (#698,214)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Towards a structural turn in consciousness science.Johannes Kleiner - 2024 - Consciousness and Cognition 119 (C):103653.
First-person experience cannot rescue causal structure theories from the unfolding argument.Michael H. Herzog, Aaron Schurger & Adrien Doerig - 2022 - Consciousness and Cognition 98:103261.
A bibliometric evaluation of the impact of theories of consciousness in academia and on social media.Andy Wai Kan Yeung, Cody A. Cushing & Alan L. F. Lee - 2022 - Consciousness and Cognition 100 (C):103296.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-ksrwm uwo