Objectivism should not be a casualty of innovation's operationalization

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):413-414 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We agree with Ramsey et al. regarding the need for new methods and concepts in the study of innovation, and welcome their initiative, but are concerned that their operationalization is over-reliant on subjective judgements

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is all learning innovation?Luke Rendell, William Hoppitt & Jeremy Kendal - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):421-422.
Innovation and the grain problem.Anne Russon, Kristin Andrews & Brian Huss - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):422-423.
Weirdness is in the eye of the beholder.Will M. Bennis & Douglas L. Medin - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):85-86.
100 years of psychology of concepts: The theoretical notion of concept and its operationalization.Edouard Machery - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (1):63-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#558,862)

6 months
9 (#475,977)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Laland
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Environmental variability and primate behavioural flexibility.Simon M. Reader & Katharine MacDonald - 2003 - In Simon M. Reader & Kevin N. Laland (eds.), Animal Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Add more references