Work of art in the Age of Its AI Reproduction

Philosophy and Social Criticism (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From a Benjaminian point of view, AI-generated art is distinct from both ‘traditional’ art and technologically enabled reproduction, for example, photography and film. Instead of mere mechanical representation of the world as it is presented to a device, AI-generated art involves identification and inventive representation of data patterns. This specific mode of data-based generation exceeds mere surface-level mimicry and enables deeper meaning, namely, an insight into the collective unconscious of the society. In this way, AI-generated art is never detached from society and the predominant social conditions while also reflecting the technology-induced transformations that today’s societies are undergoing. Thus, AI-generated art can be seen as capable of partly reversing the loss of auratic capacities that hand ensued with mechanical reproduction. Still, as a matter of continuity, AI-generated works enable the maximisation of exhibition value and capacity for audience enjoyment, rendering AI-generated art perfect for the age of increasing distraction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Algorithm.Sofie Vlaad - 2024 - Ethics and Information Technology 26 (3):1-11.
AI, Copyright, and Pseudo Art.Motoarca Ioan Radu - 2024 - Yale Journal of Law and Technology 26 (2):430-526.
Why AI Art Is Not Art – A Heideggerian Critique.Karl Kraatz & Shi-Ting Xie - 2023 - Synthesis Philosophica 38 (2):235-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-17

Downloads
6 (#1,698,044)

6 months
6 (#873,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?