The Philosophy of Doubt: How Descartes’ Methodical Skepticism Explains Cognitive Biases and Misinformation

Abstract

This paper examines Descartes’ methodic skepticism as a cognitive strategy for combating cognitive biases and misinformation. By linking his systematic doubt to modern theories of epistemic vigilance and metacognition, it explores whether skepticism reinforces critical thinking or creates excessive distrust, ultimately shaping our ability to discern truth in the digital age.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Descartes and Skepticism.Raman Sachdev - 2019 - Humanities Bulletin 2 (1):71-84.
The Oxford handbook of skepticism.John Greco (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Self‐Knowledge.Janet Broughton - 2007 - In Janet Broughton & John Carriero, A Companion to Descartes. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 179–195.
Descartes' Doubt as a 'Theory'.Masoud Omid - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 5 (9):1-16.
Spinoza on Philosophical Skepticism.Willis Doney - 1971 - The Monist 55 (4):617-635.
Skeptical Appeal: The Source‐Content Bias.John Turri - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (5):307-324.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-17

Downloads
29 (#849,362)

6 months
29 (#122,026)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations