A Narrative Theory for the October Revolution

In Thomas Telios, Dieter Thomä & Ulrich Schmid (eds.), The Russian Revolution as Ideal and Practice: Failures, Legacies, and the Future of Revolution. Springer Verlag. pp. 143-163 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taking Somerset Maugham’s Ashenden as the point of departure, I analyze how the October Revolution fails to consolidate in the discourses of history and philosophy. Instead, its intellectual consolidation seems to hinge on narrative theory—a proposition implicit to Maugham’s account of the October Revolution, but also to Carl Schmitt, who suggests in Hamlet or Hecuba that explaining political modernity may be premised on a relation forged between narration and revolution. Tellingly, Walter Benjamin identifies a similar configuration in Maugham and Ashenden, with a tacit invitation to examine it against his own narrative theory, in The Storyteller. Rather than revealing the October Revolution to be a somewhat disappointing heiress to The French Revolution and to its dazzling effect on modern history and philosophy, this examination shows that the October Revolution confronts twentieth-century modernity with the prerogatives of the English Revolution, as expounded by Schmitt, and possibly exhausts the logic of modernity and of revolution.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
7 (#1,644,695)

6 months
5 (#1,071,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references