What does the British public think about human-animal hybrid embryos?

Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):168-170 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the recent UK debate on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, there have been conflicting claims about the extent of public support for, or opposition to, human–animal hybrids. Self-selecting polls tend to show opposition to hybrids. Representative-sample polling shows spontaneous opposition but can elicit conditional approval of research, combined with underlying unease. Public opinion is very finely divided, with people generally opposed to this research unless it is likely to lead to medical advances

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Babies with some animal DNA in them”: A woman’s choice?Françoise Baylis - 2009 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (2):75-96.
Research Using Preimplantation Human Embryos.Mary Warnock & Peter Braude - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 487–494.
Animal eggs for stem cell research: A path not worth taking. Fran - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):18 – 32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
27 (#814,469)

6 months
14 (#215,666)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Albert Jones
Anscombe Bioethics Centre

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references