Relevance: a fallacy?

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):97-104 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1305/ndjfl/1093883393

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Burgess on relevance: a fallacy indeed.Stephen Read - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481.
Book Review: John P. Burgess and Gideon Rose. A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Stewart Shapiro - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (4):600-612.
Reply to Burgess and to Read.Chris Mortensen - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (2):195-200.
Editorial Thanks to Burgess.[author unknown] - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):159-159.
Review of John P. Burgess, Philosophical Logic. [REVIEW]Alasdair Urquhart - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).
Trees and finite satisfiability: proof of a conjecture of Burgess.George Boolos - 1984 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):193-197.
Review of John P. Burgess, Mathematics, Models, and Modality: Selected Philosophical Essays. [REVIEW]Thomas Hofweber - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (1).
When is a fallacy valid? Reflections on backward reasoning.Romane Clark - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (1):1-13.
John T. Kearns. Quantifiers and universal validity. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 9 , pp. 298–309. - George Goe. A reconstruction of formal logic. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 7 , pp. 129–157. - George Goe. Corrections to my paper “A reconstruction of formal logic.”Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 7 , p. 158. [REVIEW]Theodore Hailperin - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):137-138.
Relevance and conformity.Harry Deutsch - 1985 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (4):455-462.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
79 (#280,098)

6 months
3 (#1,148,921)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Burgess
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Logical Partisanhood.Jack Woods - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1203-1224.
The Hardest Paradox for Closure.Martin Smith - 2022 - Erkenntnis 87 (4):2003-2028.
Deep Fried Logic.Shay Allen Logan - 2020 - Erkenntnis 87 (1):257-286.
Assertion, denial and non-classical theories.Greg Restall - 2012 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli, Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 81--99.

View all 36 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references