- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Epistemic GDL: A logic for representing and reasoning about imperfect information games
Artificial Intelligence 294 (C):103453 (2021)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Xiong Shili, Zhang Junmai, Jiang Zhongzheng.Shuangqing Li, Yongzhen Jiang & Jiping Wu (eds.) - 1999 - Taibei Shi: Taiwan shang wu yin shu guan.
Limited lookahead in imperfect-information games.Christian Kroer & Tuomas Sandholm - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 283 (C):103218.
Gelfond–Zhang aggregates as propositional formulas.Pedro Cabalar, Jorge Fandinno, Torsten Schaub & Sebastian Schellhorn - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 274 (C):26-43.
Logical-Epistemic Foundations of General Game Descriptions.Ji Ruan & Michael Thielscher - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (2):321-338.
Value functions for depth-limited solving in zero-sum imperfect-information games.Vojtěch Kovařík, Dominik Seitz, Viliam Lisý, Jan Rudolf, Shuo Sun & Karel Ha - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 314 (C):103805.
Automatically designing counterfactual regret minimization algorithms for solving imperfect-information games.Kai Li, Hang Xu, Haobo Fu, Qiang Fu & Junliang Xing - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence 337 (C):104232.
Representing Imperfect Information of Procedures with Hyper Models.Y. Wang - 2015 - In Mamata Banerjee & S. N. Krishna (eds.), Logic and Its Applications. ICLA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8923. Springer.
Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments.Anthony Hunter, Sylwia Polberg & Matthias Thimm - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 281 (C):103236.
Reasoning about coalitional games.Thomas Ågotnes, Wiebe van der Hoek & Michael Wooldridge - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence 173 (1):45-79.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-01-20
Downloads
33 (#678,287)
6 months
6 (#835,286)
2021-01-20
Downloads
33 (#678,287)
6 months
6 (#835,286)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Epistemic planning: Perspectives on the special issue.Vaishak Belle, Thomas Bolander, Andreas Herzig & Bernhard Nebel - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 316 (C):103842.
Epistemic GDL: A logic for representing and reasoning about imperfect information games.Guifei Jiang, Dongmo Zhang, Laurent Perrussel & Heng Zhang - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 294 (C):103453.
References found in this work
A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief.Joseph Y. Halpern & Yoram Moses - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 54 (3):319-379.
Dynamic logic of preference upgrade.Johan van Benthem & Fenrong Liu - 2007 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17 (2):157-182.
Cooperation, knowledge, and time: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications.Wiebe van der Hoek & Michael Wooldridge - 2003 - Studia Logica 75 (1):125-157.
Game description language and dynamic epistemic logic compared.Thorsten Engesser, Robert Mattmüller, Bernhard Nebel & Michael Thielscher - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 292 (C):103433.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-kkgnk uwo