Response to Shankman

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (5):501-504 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This response to Shankman’s 2018 concedes some points, corrects others, and emphasizes the importance of error to the progress of science.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/0048393118785344

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Wounded theories in search of a cure: A response to Jarvie.Noël Carroll - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (3):436-444.
Introduction: The Legacy of Ian C. Jarvie.Nathaniel Laor & Raphael Sassower - 2018 - In Raphael Sassower & Nathaniel Laor (eds.), The Impact of Critical Rationalism: Expanding the Popperian Legacy Through the Works of Ian C. Jarvie. Springer Verlag. pp. 1-6.
Correction to: Science and policy in extremis: the UK’s initial response to COVID‑19.Jonathan Birch - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (3):1-1.
The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences by Ian Jarvie & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, eds. [REVIEW]Johanna Thoma - 2014 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 29 (2):311-315.
Comment On Shankman.Leon Holmes - 2001 - Catholic Social Science Review 6:147-149.
The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, edited by Ian Jarvie and Jesús Zamora-Bonilla. SAGE Publications, 2011, xvii + 749 pages. [REVIEW]Brian Epstein - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (3):428-435.
The Freeman-Mead Controversy Revisited: Or the Attempted Trashing of Derek Freeman.Ian Jarvie - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (4):531-541.
Ian C. Jarvie, The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science. [REVIEW]Jordi Cat - 2003 - Metascience 12 (1):75-77.
The Republic of Science and Its Citizens: What Role May Humanities Play Within the Popperian Framework?José A. Colen & Scott Nelson - 2018 - In Raphael Sassower & Nathaniel Laor (eds.), The Impact of Critical Rationalism: Expanding the Popperian Legacy Through the Works of Ian C. Jarvie. Springer Verlag. pp. 173-188.
Jarvie, Popper, McLuhan, and Me.Paul Levinson - 2018 - In Raphael Sassower & Nathaniel Laor (eds.), The Impact of Critical Rationalism: Expanding the Popperian Legacy Through the Works of Ian C. Jarvie. Springer Verlag. pp. 339-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-12

Downloads
27 (#830,567)

6 months
6 (#876,365)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Out of Error: Further Essays on Critical Rationalism.David Miller - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. London: Springer. pp. 417--423.
Mead and the Trajectory of Anthropology in the United States.Ian Jarvie - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (4-5):359-369.
The Mead–Freeman Controversy Continues: A Reply to Ian Jarvie.Paul Shankman - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (3):309-332.

Add more references