Replies [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):219 - 227 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the first point, the issue dividing us is this: when Kant seeks to unfold the necessary conditions of experience, what sense of ‘experience’ does he have in mind? I think it is sometimes a thin sense in which nothing more is posited than the bare consciousness of representations. Ameriks thinks it is a thicker sense in which experience involves judgment, perhaps even true judgment, and perhaps even knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies. [REVIEW]Peter Unger - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):203.
Replies. [REVIEW]Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):449-462.
Replies. [REVIEW]Jeanine M. Grenberg - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):640–654.
Replies.John Campbell - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):655-670.
Replies. [REVIEW]Robert Brandom - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):189-204.
Replies. [REVIEW]S. L. Hurley - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):447 - 465.
Replies. [REVIEW]Richard Joyce - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):245-267.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#154,039)

6 months
21 (#132,862)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2003.Margit Ruffing - 2005 - Kant Studien 96 (4):468-501.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references