The Ethics of Bundled Payments in Total Joint Replacement: “Cherry Picking” and “Lemon Dropping”

Journal of Clinical Ethics 29 (1):62-68 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has initiated bundled payments for hip and knee total joint replacement in an effort to decrease healthcare costs and increase quality of care. The ethical implications of this program have not been studied. This article considers the ethics of patient selection to improve outcomes; specifically, screening patients by body mass index to determine eligibility for total joint replacement. I argue that this type of screening is not ethically defensible, and that the bundled payment program as structured is likely to lead to unfair restrictions on who receives total joint replacements.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,061

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assessing the outcomes of total knee replacement.Martin Bardsley & Robert Cleary - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (1):47-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
17 (#1,193,434)

6 months
3 (#1,066,589)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references