The Normativity of Doxastic Correctness

American Philosophical Quarterly 55 (4):379-388 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely maintained that doxastic norms that govern how people should believe can be explained by the truism that belief is governed by the correctness norm: believing p is correct if and only if p. This approach fails because it confuses two kinds of correctness norm: (1) It is correct for S to believe p if and only p; and (2) believing p is correct qua belief if and only if p. Only can (2) be said to be a truism about belief, but it cannot ground doxastic norms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

No Norm needed: On the aim of belief.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):499–516.
Belief, Correctness and normativity.Davide Fassio - 2011 - Logique Et Analyse 54 (216):471.
On Belief: Aims, Norms, and Functions.Christopher John Atkinson - 2018 - Dissertation, Lingnan University
Doxastic Correctness.Ralph Wedgwood - 2013 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1):217-234.
Engel on doxastic correctness.Conor McHugh - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5):1451-1462.
The Knowledge Norm of Belief.Zachary Mitchell Swindlehurst - 2020 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):43-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-19

Downloads
672 (#41,918)

6 months
128 (#44,782)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tsung-Hsing Ho (何宗興)
National Chung Cheng University

References found in this work

The structure of empirical knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Doxastic deliberation.Nishi Shah & J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.
The aim of belief.Ralph Wedgwood - 2002 - Philosophical Perspectives 16:267-97.
How truth governs belief.Nishi Shah - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (4):447-482.
Normativity.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 2008 - Open Court. Edited by Russ Shafer-Landau.

View all 28 references / Add more references