A rose by any other name... Is the research / non-research distinction still important and relevant?

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):153-155 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Research ethics at the empirical side.C. D. Herrera - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):191-200.
In ethics a model is important: interview with Professor Edmund D. Pellegrino.Urh Groselj - 2023 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 44 (5):533-538.
Editorial.David C. Thomasma - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (3):423-423.
Editorial.Dave Thomasma, Gerrit Kimsma & Evert van Leeuwen - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):423-423.
Editorial.David Thomasma, Evert van Leeuwen & Gerrit Kimsma - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (5):423-423.
Philosophy of medicine in canada.Douglas N. Walton - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (2):263-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
120 (#181,378)

6 months
13 (#272,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references