The Dual Basis of Conduct

Philosophy 5 (19):408- (1930)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I do not propose in this paper to discuss what is the nature of the Good. Although the content of morality and the sanction for morality are closely connected, and it may be argued with much force that it is not practicable to deal with them separately, limits must be set to any one discussion. I would propose, therefore, not to embark upon the general question—what conduct is right and what is wrong; but, assuming that there is right and wrong, to consider why we should pursue the one and avoid the other

Other Versions

reprint Samuel, Herbert (1930) "The Dual Basis of Conduct". Humana Mente 5(19):408-421

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What would you do..Jennifer Moore-Mallinos - 2020 - Chicago, Illinois: Loyola Press. Edited by Andy Catling.
Consequentialism and History.Paul Gomberg - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):383 - 403.
The Philosopher's Defence of Morality.Philippa Foot - 1952 - Philosophy 27 (103):311 - 328.
What is morality?Kieran Setiya - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (4):1113-1133.
Philosophy: Scientific or Humanistic?John Kekes - 2015 - Philosophy 90 (2):241-262.
The Wrong Answer to an Improper Question?David Copp - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (sup1):97-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
17 (#1,167,138)

6 months
4 (#1,288,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references