Social Mereology

Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (4):395-411 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What kind of entity is a committee, a book group or a band? I argue that committees and other such social groups are concrete, composite particulars, having ordinary human beings amongst their parts. So the committee members are literally parts of the committee. This mereological view of social groups was popular several decades ago, but fell out of favour following influential objections from David-Hillel Ruben. But recent years have seen a tidal wave of work in metaphysics, including the metaphysics of parts and wholes. We now have the resources to rehabilitate the mereological view of social groups. I show how this can be done, and why we should bother.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-10

Downloads
305 (#90,485)

6 months
25 (#126,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katherine Hawley
PhD: Cambridge University; Last affiliation: University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Social Ontology.Brian Epstein - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Identity of Social Groups.Kit Fine - 2020 - Metaphysics 3 (1):81-91.
Why Composition Matters.Andrew M. Bailey & Andrew Brenner - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (8):934-949.
On the social nature of artefacts.Tim Juvshik - 2024 - Theoria 89 (6):910-932.
Social construction and indeterminacy.Kevin Richardson - 2024 - Analytic Philosophy 65 (1):37-52.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Parts of Classes.David K. Lewis - 1991 - Mind 100 (3):394-397.
Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.Paul Oppenheim & Hilary Putnam - 1958 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:3-36.
Social knowing: The social sense of 'scientific knowledge'.Alexander Bird - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):23-56.
What are groups?Katherine Ritchie - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):257-272.

View all 17 references / Add more references