Kuhn debunked

Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):175 – 182 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,756

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fuller on Kuhn.Ian Jarvie - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):187 – 195.
Crisis, Kuhn, Fuller.Hans Siggaard Jensen - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):197 – 201.
Been there, done that: Breaking free from Kuhn.Steven French - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):157 – 160.
Judging Kuhn by his fruits, or: Guilt by association?Finn Collin - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):141 – 145.
Does Thomas Kuhn have a 'model of science'?Wes Sharrock & Rupert Read - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):293-296.
Introduction to social epistemology in japan.Steve Fuller - 1999 - Social Epistemology 13 (3 & 4):241 – 242.
Jesse shera, social epistemology and praxis.John M. Budd - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (1):93 – 98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#346,380)

6 months
1 (#1,604,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jagdish Hattiangadi
York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references