The ideal of free will and determination in Anglo american philosophy during 1969-80, with special reference to Stuart Hampshire, Anthony Kenny, P.f Strawson, and Donald Davidson [Book Review]

Abstract

The philosophical problem of free will and degeneration of human actions emerging out of a profound conflict between two beliefs. The belief in freedom of human action appears to contradict the belief that all human actions are caused, and therefore determined, by physical or material factors beyond an individual's control. Freedom of action is usually conceived as freedom from the laws of nature. This is broadly called libertarianism. On the other hand, the view that all occurrences in nature, including human actions, are caused by physical conditions subsumable under causal laws is called determinism. Reconciliation between freedom and determinism falls under the position called compa1ibilism, which broadly advocates the view that human actions are both caused as well as free. Denial of the possibility of this reconciliation leads to a fourth position called compatibilism. This involves the view that beliefs in freedom and determinism are contradictory to each other and therefore cannot be held together. It seems that we cannot give up any of these two beliefs, however contradictory they might appear to the philosophical mind. In my dissertation, the views of Anglo-American philosophers, Stuart Hampshire, Anthony Kenny, P. F. Strawson, and Donald Davidson are examined on this problem. However, examination of their views has left many questions unanswered and many more questions arising out of this perennial problem. Keeping in view the immense complexity of the problem at hand, it seems impossible to offer a final solution acceptable to all. Nevertheless, description and analysis of the views of the philosophers in this dissertation is attempted in order to expose many serious problems, which would have remained unapprised. It is a central contention of my thesis that the freedom of action cannot be understood without explaining the nature of self-consciousness. I intend to. argue, through examination of the views of these philosophers,. that the paradigm of causality in nature cannot explain human actions that originate by self-conscicus mental acts. Deterministic explanations have their limits where the nature of self-consciousness is in question.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-25

Downloads
5 (#1,789,527)

6 months
5 (#828,522)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references