The annotation game: On Turing (1950) on computing, machinery, and intelligence

In Robert Epstein & G. Peters (eds.), Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and Methodological Issues in the Quest for the Thinking Computer. Springer (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This quote/commented critique of Turing's classical paper suggests that Turing meant -- or should have meant -- the robotic version of the Turing Test (and not just the email version). Moreover, any dynamic system (that we design and understand) can be a candidate, not just a computational one. Turing also dismisses the other-minds problem and the mind/body problem too quickly. They are at the heart of both the problem he is addressing and the solution he is proposing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Imitation Game.John Mark Bishop - 2010 - Kybernetes 39 (3):398-402.
Making the right identification in the Turing test.Saul Traiger - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
Turing test: 50 years later.Ayse Pinar Saygin, Ilyas Cicekli & Varol Akman - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.
Computing Machinery and Sexual Difference: The Sexed Presuppositions Underlying the Turing Test.Amy Kind - 2022 - In Keya Maitra & Jennifer McWeeny (eds.), Feminist Philosophy of Mind. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press, Usa.
The status and future of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
90 (#234,183)

6 months
6 (#873,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stevan Harnad
Université du Québec à Montréal

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references