A Response to Zambrano

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (1):134-137 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alexander Zambrano sets out to refute an argument that I have made on a number of occasions over many years since 1992, which he calls “Harris’s Greater Need Argument” (2002).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Collective Reflective Equilibrium, Algorithmic Bioethics and Complex Ethics.Julian Savulescu - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-16.
Embryo Research: Are There Any Lessons from Natural Reproduction?Julian Savulescu - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):68-75.
What’s Wrong with Restrictivism?William M. Simkulet - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (2):296-299.
John Harris: An Appreciation.John J. Paris - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):165-167.
Quantifier Variance and the Collapse Argument.Jared Warren - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (259):241-253.
Consequentialism without Consequences: Ethics and Embryo Research.Sarah Chan & John Harris - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):61.
Values of Life: 40 years of The Value of Life.Tuija Takala, Matti Häyry, Rebecca Bennett & Søren Holm - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-06

Downloads
6 (#1,702,752)

6 months
2 (#1,696,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wonderwoman and Superman.John Harris & Max Charlesworth - 1994 - Bioethics 8 (2):187-188.

Add more references