- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Non-Additive Beliefs in Solvable Games
Theory and Decision 49 (4):313-338 (2000)
Abstract
This paper studies how the introduction of non-additive probabilities (capacities) affects the solvability of strategic gamesOther Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox.Jürgen Eichberger & David Kelsey - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (2):107-138.
An additive representation on the product of complete, continuous extensive structures.Yutaka Matsushita - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (1):1-16.
Basic Notions of Non‐Cooperative Game Theory.David M. Kreps - 1990 - In Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford University Press UK.
On games under expected utility with rank dependent probabilities.Klaus Ritzberger - 1996 - Theory and Decision 40 (1):1-27.
Strategic games with security and potential level players.Alexander Zimper - 2007 - Theory and Decision 63 (1):53-78.
Pure-strategy Equilibria with Non-expected Utility Players.Ho-Chyuan Chen & William S. Neilson - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (2):201-212.
Non-uniqueness of equilibrium action profiles with equal size in one-shot cheap-talk games.Irene Valsecchi - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (1):31-53.
KâPlayer Additive Extension of Two-Player games with an Application to the Borda Electoral Competition Game.Gilbert Laffond, Jean-François Laslier & Michel Le Breton - 2000 - Theory and Decision 48 (2):129-137.
The evolutionary stability of optimism, pessimism, and complete ignorance.Burkhard C. Schipper - 2021 - Theory and Decision 90 (3-4):417-454.
Non-conglomerability for countably additive measures that are not κ-additive.Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark J. Schervish & Joseph B. Kadane - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):284-300.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
109 (#197,098)
6 months
1 (#1,894,012)
2010-09-02
Downloads
109 (#197,098)
6 months
1 (#1,894,012)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction.Andrew M. Colman - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):139-153.
E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox.Jürgen Eichberger & David Kelsey - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (2):107-138.
Bridging psychology and game theory yields interdependence theory.Paul A. M. Van Lange & Marcello Gallucci - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):177-178.
Nash was a first to axiomatize expected utility.Han Bleichrodt, Chen Li, Ivan Moscati & Peter P. Wakker - 2016 - Theory and Decision 81 (3):309-312.
The evolutionary stability of optimism, pessimism, and complete ignorance.Burkhard C. Schipper - 2021 - Theory and Decision 90 (3-4):417-454.
References found in this work
Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity.David Schmeidler - 1989 - Econometrica 57:571-589.
E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox.Jürgen Eichberger & David Kelsey - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (2):107-138.
Nash Equilibrium with Lower Probabilities.Ebbe Groes, Hans Jørgen Jacobsen, Birgitte Sloth & Torben Tranaes - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (1):37-66.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-f5f4x uwo