Argument Against Governments Forcing Protests to Stop

Abstract

This argument demonstrates that suppressing protests undermines societal progress, destabilizes governance, and erodes public trust. It emphasizes protests as intrinsic expressions of human dignity and societal evolution, supported by historical evidence and ethical reasoning. The argument offers practical solutions for governments to engage constructively with dissent, fostering justice, harmony, and progress.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Law and Social Protests.Roberto Gargarella - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):131-148.
Undemocratic Climate Protests.Francisco Garcia-Gibson - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 39 (1):162-179.
Det rådsdemokratiske ideal og protesten som selvorganisering.Benjamin Ask Popp-Madsen - 2015 - Slagmark - Tidsskrift for Idéhistorie 71:195-210.
Civil Disobedience and Abortion Protests: The Case for Amending Criminal Trespass Statutes.Paul Davis & William Davis - 1991 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 5 (4):995-1042.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-16

Downloads
55 (#398,246)

6 months
55 (#96,845)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references