The Ethics of Political Bots: Should We Allow Them For Personal Use?

Journal of Practical Ethics 5 (2):85-104 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The technology to create and automate large numbers of fake social media users, or “social bots”, is becoming increasingly more accessible to private individuals. This paper explores one potential use of the technology, namely the creation of “political bots”: social bots aimed at influencing the political opinions of others. Despite initial worries about licensing the use of such bots by private individuals, this paper provides an, albeit limited, argument in favour of this. The argument begins by providing a prima facie case in favour of these political bots and proceeds by attempting to answer a series of potential objections. These objections are based on (1) the dangerous effectiveness of the technology; the (2) corruptive, (3) deceitful and (4) manipulating nature of political bots; (5) the worry that the technology will lead to chaos and be detrimental to trust online; and (6) practical issues involved in ensuring acceptable use of the technology. In all cases I will argue that the objections are overestimated, and that a closer look at the use of political bots helps us realise that using them is simply a new way of speaking up in modern society.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bots, Social Capital, and the Need for Civility.Miles C. Coleman - 2018 - Journal of Media Ethics 33 (3):120-132.
Introduction.[author unknown] - 2018 - Journal of Media Ethics 33 (3):101-101.
Bots: Some Less-Considered Epistemic Problems.Benjamin Winokur - 2023 - Social Epistemology 37 (5):713-725.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-13

Downloads
454 (#62,901)

6 months
71 (#85,117)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonas Haeg
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Definition of Lying and Deception.James Edwin Mahon - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references