- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Cognitive Diversity and Moral Enhancement
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):66-74 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Guest Editorial: How Moral is Moral Enhancement?Vojin Rakić & James Hughes - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):3-6.
Commentary: The Implementation Ethics of Moral Enhancement.Nicholas Agar - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):55-61.
A Debate about Moral Enhancement.John Harris & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):8-22.
Commentary: Cognitive Enhancement: Are the Claims of Critics “Good Enough”?Vojin Rakić - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (4):693-698.
Genome Editing for Involuntary Moral Enhancement.Vojin Rakić - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):46-54.
Moral Enhancement Requires Multiple Virtues.James J. Hughes - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):86-95.
Commentary: Aiding or Abetting? Responding to a Request for Cognitive Enhancement.William S. Andereck - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (4):700-701.
Commentary: Modeling the Social Dynamics of Moral Enhancement While Illustrating Some Basic Divergences in the Enhancement Debate.Søren Holm - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (3):446-448.
Biological Determinism, Free Will and Moral Responsibility: Insights from Genetics and Neuroscience, by Chris Willmott. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016. 84 pp. [REVIEW]Gerard Magill - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):741-743.
Doing Good, Choosing Freely: How Moral Enhancement Can Be Compatible with Individual Freedom.Joshua M. Brostoff - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (4):698-709.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-12-06
Downloads
44 (#498,457)
6 months
5 (#1,015,253)
2014-12-06
Downloads
44 (#498,457)
6 months
5 (#1,015,253)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Creating Future People: The Science and Ethics of Genetic Enhancement (2nd edition).Jonathan Anomaly - 2024 - London, UK: Routledge.
Great Minds Think Different: Preserving Cognitive Diversity in an Age of Gene Editing.Jonny Anomaly, Julian Savulescu & Christopher Gyngell - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):81-89.
Neurofeedback-Based Moral Enhancement and Traditional Moral Education.Koji Tachibana - 2018 - Humana Mente 11 (33):19-42.
Neurofeedback-Based Moral Enhancement and the Notion of Morality.Koji Tachibana - 2017 - The Annals of the University of Bucharest - Philosophy Series 66 (2):25-41.
References found in this work
The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):162-177.
The Goodness of Fragility: On the Prospect of Genetic Technologies Aimed at the Enhancement of Human Capacities.Erik Parens - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (2):141-153.
Moderate eugenics and human enhancement.Michael J. Selgelid - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1):3-12.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-snkrx uwo