A Debate about Moral Enhancement

&
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):8-22 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0963180114000279

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How to Be Good: The Possibility of Moral Enhancement, by John Harris. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. 195 pp. [REVIEW]John Coggon - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):733-737.
Response to “The Creation Lottery” by Julian Savulescu and John Harris : The Creation Lottery and Method in Bioethics: A Comment on Savulescu and Harris. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):283-287.
Section II. Advancing the debate. Enhancing conservatism / Rebecca Roache and Julian Savulescu ; Maclntyre's paradox / Bernadette Tobin ; Partiality for humanity and enhancement / Jonathan Pugh, Guy Kahane, and Julian Savulescu ; Enhancement, mind-uploading, and personal identity / Nicholas Agar ; Levelling the playing field : on the alleged unfairness of the genetic lottery / Michael Hauskeller ; Buchanan and the conservative argument against human enhancement from biological and social harmony / Steve Clarke ; Moral enhancement, enhancement, and sentiment / Gregory E. Kaebnick ; The evolution of moral enhancement. [REVIEW]Russell Powell & Allen Buchanan - 2016 - In Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal, The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Moral Bioenhancement and Free Will: Continuing the Debate.Vojin Rakić - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (3):384-393.
Commentary: Modeling the Social Dynamics of Moral Enhancement While Illustrating Some Basic Divergences in the Enhancement Debate.Søren Holm - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (3):446-448.
Consequentialism without Consequences: Ethics and Embryo Research.Sarah Chan & John Harris - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):61.
... How Narrow the Strait!John Harris - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (3):247-260.
John Harris: An Appreciation.John J. Paris - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):165-167.
Bioethics and Human Enhancement: an Interview with Julian Savulescu.M. Ángeles Arráez, Miguel Moreno, Francisco Lara, Pedro Francés & Javier Rodríguez Alcázar - 2010 - Dilemata 3:15-25.
Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal: the Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate: Oxford University Press, 2016. Hardcover €64,32. 320 pp.Lily Eva Frank - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (5):1095-1098.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-06

Downloads
121 (#185,020)

6 months
11 (#271,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
John Terence Harris
Birkbeck College

Citations of this work

Neurofeedback-Based Moral Enhancement and the Notion of Morality.Koji Tachibana - 2017 - The Annals of the University of Bucharest - Philosophy Series 66 (2):25-41.
Bioethics and Moral Agency: On Autonomy and Moral Responsibility.John Skalko & Mark J. Cherry - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (5):435-443.
An Obligation to Enhance?Anton Vedder - 2019 - Topoi 38 (1):49-52.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references