The cognitive element in aesthetic experience: Reply to Matravers

British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):412-418 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

...as a Kantian model of aesthetic experience a free play of the cognitive faculties with beliefs or propositions. This is false to Kant, whose conception is better interpreted as a free play with elements of cognition such as intuitions and concepts. More importantly, an account closer to Kant's original provides a less restrictive model of aesthetic experience than Matravers's interpretation does, and therefore one that more readily fits a much larger number of cases.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The critic of free harmony of faculties.Ali Salmani - 2017 - Metaphysics (University of Isfahan) 9 (23):37-50.
Gerard and Kant: Influence and Opposition.Paul Guyer - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):59-93.
The Psychology Of Kant’s Aesthetics.Paul Guyer - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):483-494.
Seventy-Five Years of Kant … and Counting.Paul Guyer - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4):351-362.
Velocidade e Acordo.Vítor Moura - 2004 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (24):43-64.
The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant's Aesthetic Ideas.Samantha Matherne - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):21-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#249,427)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Guyer
Brown University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references