Aesthetic pleasure: cognition and emotion in the aesthetic concepts. Remarks after Sibley’s works

Rivista di Estetica 55:183-201 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to propose a new categorization of a specific set of aesthetic concepts, using Sibley’s theory of the aesthetic concepts as a starting point. I discuss the status of aesthetic concepts connected with pleasure and the role of aesthetic pleasure. I examine Sibley’s theory and the importance of its results for the conceptual art. Then, I compare Sibley’s theory and Kant’s theory specifically on the theme of judgment, universal agreement and pleasure. I finally propose to look at these theories as complementary (they deal with the same problems but Sibley takes an objective position, since his main focus is the object and its properties, while in Kant’s theory the focus is on the subject) since they achieve important results for the theory of aesthetic concepts, both from the perspective of the subject and from the perspective of the object.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Introduction: Sibley's vision.Emily Brady - 2001 - In Emily Brady & Jerrold Levinson (eds.), Aesthetic concepts: essays after Sibley. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peter Lamarque’s aesthetic essentialism.Mona Roxana Shields - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Reading
Aesthetic concepts: essays after Sibley.Emily Brady & Jerrold Levinson (eds.) - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All.Anna Bergqvist - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14.
Aesthetic concepts and aesthetic experiences.Derek Matravers - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):265-279.
Sibley on ‘Beautiful’ and ‘Ugly’.Andrea Sauchelli - 2014 - Philosophical Papers 43 (3):377-404.
Frank Sibley's “Aesthetic Concepts”.R. David Broiles - 1964 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23 (2):219-225.
Sibley's "aesthetic concepts": An ontological mistake.Gary Stahl - 1971 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29 (3):385-389.
Aesthetic Disinterestedness in Kant and Schopenhauer.Bart Vandenabeele - 2012 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 49 (1):45-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
55 (#390,837)

6 months
9 (#475,977)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giulia Bonasio
Columbia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Transfiguration of the Commonplace.Warren Quinn & Arthur C. Danto - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (3):481.
Hume's standard of taste: The real problem.Jerrold Levinson - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (3):227–238.
Lawfulness without a Law.Hannah Ginsborg - 1997 - Philosophical Topics 25 (1):37-81.
The problem of non-perceptual art.James Shelley - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):363-378.
Art and Imagination.Roger Scruton - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (193):367-368.

View all 20 references / Add more references