- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
How significant is the Liar?
In J. C. Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflation and Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Denying the Problem. Deflationists and the Liar Paradox.Paula-Pompilia Tomi - 2018 - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia:89-103.
Is the Liar sentence both true and false?Hartry Field - 2005 - In J. C. Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflation and Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Review: Nuel D. Belnap, Dorothy L. Grover, Quantifying in and out of' Quotes; Dorothy L. Grover, Propositional Quantification and Quotation Contexts. [REVIEW]Melvin Fitting - 1977 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (2):313-313.
Tarski's Grelling and the T-Strategy.Greg Ray - 2006 - In Bryson Brown (ed.), Truth and Probability: Essays in Honour of Hugues Leblanc. College Publications.
Buddhist Epistemology and the Liar Paradox.Szymon Bogacz - 2024 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 102 (1):206-220.
Yablo’s Paradox: Is the Infinite Liar Lying to Us?Andrei V. Nekhaev - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (3):88-102.
Prosentential theory of truth in Dorothy Grover (1936-2017).Diane Proudfoot, Joseph Ulatowski & Jeremy Wyatt - 2022 - Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers.
Minimalism, epistemicism, and paradox.Bradley Armour-Garb & J. C. Beall - 2005 - In J. C. Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflation and Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burge's Contextual Theory of Truth and the Super-Liar Paradox.Matt Leonard - 2012 - In Michal Pelis Vit Puncochar (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2011. College Publications.
The Paradox of the liar.Robert Lazarus Martin (ed.) - 1970 - New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-04-03
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2014-04-03
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Restricting the T‐schema to Solve the Liar.Jared Warren - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 108 (1):238-258.
Assertoric Semantics and the Computational Power of Self-Referential Truth.Stefan Wintein - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):317-345.
Typed and Untyped Disquotational Truth.Cezary Cieśliński - 2015 - In T. Achourioti, H. Galinon, J. Martínez Fernández & K. Fujimoto (eds.), Unifying the Philosophy of Truth. Dordrecht: Imprint: Springer.
Unifying the Philosophy of Truth.Theodora Achourioti, Henri Galinon, José Martínez Fernández & Kentaro Fujimoto (eds.) - 2015 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Truth, Pretense and the Liar Paradox.Bradley Armour-Garb & James A. Woodbridge - 2015 - In T. Achourioti, H. Galinon, J. Martínez Fernández & K. Fujimoto (eds.), Unifying the Philosophy of Truth. Dordrecht: Imprint: Springer. pp. 339-354.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-82spv uwo