The level of filling-in and when it is cognitive

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):758-758 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This informative and conceptually stimulating target article is very useful. I merely query whether the term “illusory contours” is appropriate for gap filling; “illusory surfaces” seems better – and “fictional surfaces” better still. These seem to be rule based rather than knowledge based, suggesting indeed the importance of distinguishing rules (analogous to syntax in language) from knowledge (equivalent to semantics) for classifying perceptual phenomena.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On illusory contours and their functional significance.Birgitta Dresp - 1997 - Current Psychology of Cognition 16:489-518.
The functional effects of modal versus amodal filling-in.Greg Davis & Jon Driver - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):752-753.
Syntax, or, the embryogenesis of meaning.Paul J. M. Jorion - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1027-1028.
We can't fill in answers to philosophical questions.Lloyd Kaufman - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):760-761.
Computational cognitive epigenetics.Aaron Sloman & Jackie Chappell - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):375-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#627,593)

6 months
11 (#345,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references