Historians and Philosophers of Logic: Are They Compatible? The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem as a Case Study

History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):169-180 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper combines personal reminiscences of the philosopher John Corcoran with a discussion of certain conflicts between historians of logic and philosophers of logic. Some mistaken claims about the history of the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem are analyzed in detail and corrected

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Bolzano‐Weierstraß to Arzelà‐Ascoli.Alexander P. Kreuzer - 2014 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 60 (3):177-183.
Beth definability and the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem.Luca Reggio - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (8):102990.
Ontologically neutral logic.Theodore Hailperin - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (4):185-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
74 (#283,290)

6 months
5 (#1,039,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?