How to Talk about Visual Perception? The Case of the Duck / Rabbit

In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophy of Language and Linguistics: The Legacy of Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 53-70 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Remarks on the philosophy of psychology Wittgenstein uses ambiguous illusions to investigate the problematic relation of perception and interpretation. I use this problem as a starting point for developing a conceptual framework capable of expressing problems associated with visual perception in a precise manner. I do this by discerning between subjective and objective meaning of the term “to see” and by specifying the beliefs which are to be ascribed to the observer when we assert that she sees a given object. The framework (detailed in section 2) is then used to analyze the case of the duck/rabbit illusion. It shows that ambiguous illusions present us with a specific skeptical challenge but that the challenge can be overcome by empirical sciences. Along the way I explicate some of the common notions associated with perception (“to look at”, “to have an impression of…”, "to react as if one had an impression of..”, “to convince oneself that what one sees is…”).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein’s challenge to enactivism.Victor Loughlin - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 1):391-404.
Gombrich and the Duck-Rabbit.Robert Eamon Briscoe - 2015 - In Michael Beaney, Brendan Harrington & Dominic Shaw (eds.), Aspect Perception After Wittgenstein: Seeing-as and Novelty. New York: Routledge. pp. 49-88.
Fat Wednesday: Wittgenstein on aspects.John Verdi - 2010 - Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books.
The Illusion Confusion.Clare Batty - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5:1-11.
The openness of illusions.Louise Antony - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):25-44.
An Ecological Account of Visual 'Illusions'.Luis H. Favela & Anthony Chemero - 2016 - Florida Philosophical Review 16 (1):68-93.
Affording illusions? Natural Information and the Problem of Misperception.Hajo Greif - 2019 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 10 (3):1-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-07

Downloads
710 (#35,984)

6 months
146 (#31,131)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pawel Grabarczyk
University of Lodz

References found in this work

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1982 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free will. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references