Kuhn, the duck and the rabbit — Perception, theory-ladenness and creativity in science

In K. Brad Wray (ed.), Interpreting Kuhn: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 169-184 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theory-Ladenness of Observations as a Test Case of Kuhn's Approach to Scientific Inquiry.Jaakko Hintikka - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:277-286.
Interpreting Kuhn: Critical Essays.K. Brad Wray (ed.) - 2021 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gombrich and the Duck-Rabbit.Robert Eamon Briscoe - 2015 - In Michael Beaney, Brendan Harrington & Dominic Shaw (eds.), Aspect Perception After Wittgenstein: Seeing-as and Novelty. New York: Routledge. pp. 49-88.
What is Kuhn’s Problem?Kevin Davey - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (4):111-125.
Permanent Revolution In Science: A Quantum Epistemology.Steve Fuller - 2021 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 51 (1):48-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vasso Kindi
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references