Can machines think? The controversy that led to the Turing test

AI and Society 38 (6):2499-2509 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Turing’s much debated test has turned 70 and is still fairly controversial. His 1950 paper is seen as a complex and multilayered text, and key questions about it remain largely unanswered. Why did Turing select learning from experience as the best approach to achieve machine intelligence? Why did he spend several years working with chess playing as a task to illustrate and test for machine intelligence only to trade it out for conversational question-answering in 1950? Why did Turing refer to gender imitation in a test for machine intelligence? In this article, I shall address these questions by unveiling social, historical and epistemological roots of the so-called Turing test. I will draw attention to a historical fact that has been only scarcely observed in the secondary literature thus far, namely that Turing’s 1950 test emerged out of a controversy over the cognitive capabilities of digital computers, most notably out of debates with physicist and computer pioneer Douglas Hartree, chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi, and neurosurgeon Geoffrey Jefferson. Seen in its historical context, Turing’s 1950 paper can be understood as essentially a reply to a series of challenges posed to him by these thinkers arguing against his view that machines can think. Turing did propose gender learning and imitation as one of his various imitation tests for machine intelligence, and I argue here that this was done in response to Jefferson's suggestion that gendered behavior is causally related to the physiology of sex hormones.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The status and future of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
The Turing Test is a Thought Experiment.Bernardo Gonçalves - 2023 - Minds and Machines 33 (1):1-31.
The Imitation Game.John Mark Bishop - 2010 - Kybernetes 39 (3):398-402.
Alan Turing’s Concept of Mind.Rajakishore Nath - 2020 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 37 (1):31-50.
Computing Machinery and Sexual Difference: The Sexed Presuppositions Underlying the Turing Test.Amy Kind - 2022 - In Keya Maitra & Jennifer McWeeny, Feminist Philosophy of Mind. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press, Usa.
Making the right identification in the Turing test.Saul Traiger - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-11

Downloads
1,596 (#10,233)

6 months
339 (#6,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernardo Gonçalves
University of São Paulo

References found in this work

On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem.Alan Turing - 1936 - Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 42 (1):230-265.
Language and nature.Noam Chomsky - 1995 - Mind 104 (413):1-61.
Turing test: 50 years later.Ayse Pinar Saygin, Ilyas Cicekli & Varol Akman - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.

View all 21 references / Add more references