- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Explanation in evolutionary biology: Comments on Fodor
Mind and Language 23 (1):32–41 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review: Peter Godfrey-Smith. Philosophy of Biology. [REVIEW]Review by: Cailin O’Connor - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (4):731-733.
Where does thinking come from? A commentary on Peter Godfrey-Smith's complexity and the function of mind in nature.Kim Sterelny - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):551-566.
Commentary on Kerr and Godfrey-Smith.John Maynard Smith - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (4):523-527.
Fodor and psychological explanation.John Perry & David J. Israel - 1990 - In Barry M. Loewer (ed.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Comments on “fitness and evolutionary explanation”.Scott A. Kleiner - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):29-32.
Peter Godfrey-Smith, Philosophy of Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press , 200 pp., $29.95. [REVIEW]Cailin O’Connor - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (4):731-733.
Natural selection doesn't work that way: Jerry Fodor vs. evolutionary psychology on gradualism and saltationism.André Ariew - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):478-483.
Darwinian spaces: Peter Godfrey-Smith on selection and evolution.Kim Sterelny - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):489-500.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
94 (#223,700)
6 months
5 (#1,038,502)
2009-01-28
Downloads
94 (#223,700)
6 months
5 (#1,038,502)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Who Got What Wrong? Fodor and Piattelli on Darwin: Guiding Principles and Explanatory Models in Natural Selection.José Díez & Pablo Lorenzano - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (5):1143-1175.
An Improper Introduction to Epistemic utility theory.Richard Pettigrew - 2012 - In Henk de Regt, Samir Okasha & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Proceedings of EPSA09. Berlin: Springer. pp. 287--301.
Demarcating presentism.Christian Wuthrich - 2011 - In Henk W. De Regt, Stephan Hartmann & Samir Okasha (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 441--450.
Darwin’s principles of divergence and natural selection: Why Fodor was almost right.Robert J. Richards - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):256-268.
References found in this work
Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation.James F. Woodward - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World.Wesley C. Salmon - 1984 - Princeton University Press.
Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1965 - New York: The Free Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-g6qm9 uwo