- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Fun and games in fantasyland
Mind and Language 23 (1):25–31 (2008)
Abstract
commentary on Fodor, “Against Darwinism.”.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Explanation in evolutionary biology: Comments on Fodor.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (1):32–41.
Daniel Dennett: Reconciling Science and Our Self-Conception.Matthew Elton - 2003 - Malden, MA: Polity.
Theory of mind and the ontology of belief.Simone Gozzano - 1997 - Il Cannocchiale 2 (May-August):145-156.
Animal Brains and the Work of Words: Daniel Dennett on Natural Language and the Human Mind.Sofia Miguens - 2021 - Topoi 41 (3):599-607.
Dennett, Foucault, and the selection of memes.Grant Gillett - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):3 – 23.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
78 (#265,588)
6 months
6 (#825,551)
2009-01-28
Downloads
78 (#265,588)
6 months
6 (#825,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The evolution of misbelief.Ryan McKay & Daniel Dennett - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):493–510; discussion 510–61.
Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.Shira Elqayam & Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):233-248.
Who Got What Wrong? Fodor and Piattelli on Darwin: Guiding Principles and Explanatory Models in Natural Selection.José Díez & Pablo Lorenzano - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (5):1143-1175.
Medium Independence and the Failure of the Mechanistic Account of Computation.Corey J. Maley - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10.
Darwin’s principles of divergence and natural selection: Why Fodor was almost right.Robert J. Richards - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):256-268.
References found in this work
Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology.Daniel Clement Dennett (ed.) - 1978 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Bradford Books.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-snkrx uwo