The Agent Prescriber's “Ought”

Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):141-143 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

No Better Reasons: A Reply to Alan Gewirth.Matthew H. Kramer & Nigel E. Simmonds - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):131-139.
“‘Ought’ does imply ‘can’“.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):382-393.
A difficulty with 'ought implies can'.Frederick Brouwer - 1969 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):45-50.
‘Ought’ and Reasons for Action.Alan Gewirth - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):171-177.
Having it both ways with “ought”.Ronald A. Cordero - 1975 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):427-434.
“Ought implies can” and the price of duty.Rita C. Manning - 1981 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):117-121.
Against an Agent-Causal Theory of Action.Noel Hendrickson - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):41-58.
Can the agent-to-be predict his decision?Richard D. Parry - 1972 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):333-336.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#405,619)

6 months
13 (#276,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references