On Deriving a Morally Significant ‘Ought’

Philosophy 54 (208):231-232 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,804

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
58 (#404,796)

6 months
11 (#337,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The autonomy of ethics.A. N. Prior - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):199 – 206.
The gap between "is" and "should".Max Black - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (2):165-181.
The autonomy of morals.David Rynin - 1957 - Mind 66 (263):308-317.
Murder and Sodomy.P. T. Geach - 1976 - Philosophy 51 (197):346 - 348.
The 'Is-Ought' Problem Resolved.Alan Gewirth - 1973 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:34 - 61.

Add more references