Right Problem, Wrong Solution: A Pro-Choice Response to “Expressivist” Concerns about Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):20-34 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In August 2005, the United Kingdom's Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority launched a public consultation, seeking views on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the detection of cancer genes. The issue was considered by the Authority to be a possible source of particular controversy because it involved extending the range of conditions for which PGD can be licensed in a potentially important way: As well as testing for genes that would definitely cause disease traits, such as cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy, this would involve genes that would only possibly manifest themselves phenotypically. In other words, there is a very real chance that such an application of PGD would result in the destruction of perfectly healthy embryos.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection.S. Matthew Liao - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):116-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
72 (#293,002)

6 months
12 (#305,729)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references