- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Shouldn’t Our Virtual Avatars be Granted Human Rights Too?
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (3):160-162 (2022)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Compulsory treatment: askwhothe patient really is. A response to Mirko Garasic.Charles Foster - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (1):24-25.
Universal Human Rights.Sara M. Bergstresser - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (3):171-173.
Neuroethics Needs an International Human Rights Deliberative Frame.Luis Justo & Fabiana Erazun - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):17-18.
Dynamic Consent in Neuroscience Too?Henri-Corto Stoeklé, Achille Ivasilevitch & Christian Hervé - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (1):70-72.
Expressive Avatars: Vitality in Virtual Worlds.David Ekdahl & Lucy Osler - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (2):1-28.
Making Progress in the Ethics of Digital and Virtual Technologies for Mental Health.Ilina Singh - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (3):141-143.
Leaping Too Far Too Soon.Jay P. Granier, Shane Mcnamee, David X. Cifu & Gary Goldberg - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):60-61.
Neurons Embodied in a Virtual World: Evidence for Organoid Ethics?Brett J. Kagan, Daniela Duc, Ian Stevens & Frederic Gilbert - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (2):114-117.
Reasons and Freedom.Alberto Giubilini & Francesca Minerva - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (1):4-5.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-07-09
Downloads
31 (#724,843)
6 months
6 (#851,135)
2022-07-09
Downloads
31 (#724,843)
6 months
6 (#851,135)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology.Marcello Ienca & Roberto Andorno - 2017 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):1-27.
Is Virtually Everything Possible? The Relevance of Ethics and Human Rights for Introducing Extended Reality in Forensic Psychiatry.Sjors Ligthart, Gerben Meynen, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Tijs Kooijmans & Philipp Kellmeyer - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (3):144-157.
The onlife manifesto—the onlife initiative.Luciano Floridi - 2014 - In The online manifesto: being human in a hyper-connected era. Cham: Springer Nature. pp. 7–13.
Present and Future Instances of Virtual Rape in Light of Three Categories of Legal Philosophical Theories on Rape.Litska Strikwerda - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (4):491-510.
Force-feeding, hunger strikes, Guantanamo and autonomy: replies to George Annas, Charles Foster and Michael Gross.Mirko D. Garasic - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (1):28-29.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-kkgnk uwo