A Kantian Interpretation of Kelsen’s Basic Norm

Ratio Juris 33 (1):35-48 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper proposes a reading of Kelsen’s basic norm based on Kant’s regulative ideas. I begin by exposing Kant’s conception of the principles of reason. Then I criticize an interpretation of the basic norm along the same lines made by Stanley Paulson. Thirdly I analyze two theses from Hermann Cohen that influenced Kelsen greatly and reinforce my stance on the basic norm. Lastly, I explain how the Kelsenian tenet that the basic norm is the transcendental grounding of the normativity of law can be comprehended based on the role the ideas of reason play in the systematization of knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-25

Downloads
48 (#458,202)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mario Garcia
Instituto Politecnico Nacional

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
The Pure Theory of Law.Hans Kelsen & Max Knight - 1968 - Philosophical Quarterly 18 (73):377-377.
Logik der reinen Erkenntniss.Hermann Cohen - 1903 - The Monist 13:633.
Ethik des reinen Willens.Hermann Cohen - 1984 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 89 (2):272-273.
The temporality of normativity.Carlo Invernizzi Accetti - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (1):25-43.

View all 10 references / Add more references