Animal Activists and the Possibility of Response

Mosaic 53 (2):97-108 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animalistic rhetoric is often used to discredit and criminalize political activists. While such dehumanization is embedded within a history of racially-motivated oppression and certainly calls for a reassertion of humanity, I ultimately argue that viewing animals as apolitical forecloses rich possibilities for political resistance.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nature Without the State: An Anarchist Critique of ‘Animalistic Evil’.Jason K. Day - 2022 - Studies in the History of Philosophy 13 (3):63-79.
Philosophical Collaborations with Activists.Andrea J. Pitts - 2022 - In Lee C. McIntyre, Nancy Arden McHugh & Ian Olasov, A companion to public philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 347–358.
Political solidarity and violent resistance.Sally J. Scholz - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (1):38–52.
Criminalising (cubes of) truth: animal advocacy, civil disobedience, and the politics of sight.Serrin Rutledge-Prior - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-03

Downloads
202 (#128,203)

6 months
97 (#67,250)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Gammage
DePaul University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Animal Minds.John R. Searle - 1994 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):206-219.

Add more references