The Contemporary Moral Crisis

New Scholasticism 60 (2):186-212 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The consumerist elevation of wants into needs requires the elevation of ethical relativism into the status of a "dogma." Collectivism and individualism are the two faces of this dogma and require the uneasy mediation of the claims of utilitarianism and romanticism. The historical and philosophical backdrop for this mediation is suggested with reference to Aristotle, Aquinas, Kant, J.S. Mill, De Tocqueville, and Oakeshott

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revelation and Dogma in Contemporary Thought.Rudolph G. Bandas - 1927 - New Scholasticism 1 (2):119-135.
Aquinas, Kant, and Donagan on Moral Principles. Boyle - 1984 - New Scholasticism 58 (4):391-408.
Kant and Aquinas.Henry B. Veatch - 1974 - New Scholasticism 48 (1):73-99.
Aquinas and Ethical Naturalism.Robert B. Ashmore Jr - 1975 - New Scholasticism 49 (1):76-86.
Mr. J ustice Cardoza’s Relativism.Miriam Rooney - 1945 - New Scholasticism 19 (1):1-47.
Kant and the Claims of Taste. [REVIEW]Karl Americs - 1980 - New Scholasticism 54 (2):241-249.
Aquinas and the Moral Status of Animals.Peter Drum - 1992 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 66 (4):483-488.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
27 (#834,437)

6 months
9 (#511,775)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references