Should Kantians Be Willing to Embrace “Universally Lawful Willing” as a Good Will’s Fundamental Principle?

Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (2):33-39 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Beautiful and the Good.E. M. Dadlez - 1999 - Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1):99-106.
The Aesthetically Good Vs. The Morally Good.Manuel Davenport - 1997 - Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (1):205-210.
A Rejection of the Epistemic Closure Principle.Richard Greene - 2001 - Southwest Philosophy Review 17 (2):59-73.
On God, the Good, and the Right.Michael Beaty - 1989 - Southwest Philosophy Review 5 (2):25-35.
Is “Ought Implies Can” a Moral Principle?Russell Jacobs - 1985 - Southwest Philosophy Review 2:43-54.
Bentham on Justifying the Principle of Utility.Arthur R. Miller - 1996 - Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (2):133-139.
Knowledge and Desire of the Good in Republic.Glenn Rawson - 1996 - Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (1):103-115.
Emergent Panpsychism, Emotional Zombies, and Fundamental Kinds.Maxwell Suffis - 2015 - Southwest Philosophy Review 31 (1):251-262.
Why Pragmatists Should be Rawlsians.Robert B. Talisse - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):71-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
47 (#499,682)

6 months
7 (#516,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Galvin
Texas Christian University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references