Antibiotic Resistance, Meat Consumption and the Harm Principle

Ethics, Policy and Environment 26 (1):53-68 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. This paper investigates the viability of the harm principle (HP) to justify restricting consumer freedom regarding the purchase of products, such as meat, that require intense use of antibiotics...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Harm to Others: The social cost of antibiotics in agriculture.Jonny Anomaly - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (5):423-435.
Ethics, science, and antimicrobial resistance.Bernard Rollin - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (1):29-37.
Antibiotic Resistance Spreads Internationally across Borders.Tamar F. Barlam & Kalpana Gupta - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (s3):12-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-14

Downloads
22 (#972,197)

6 months
5 (#1,039,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Davide Fumagalli
University of Gothenburg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causation.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (17):556-567.
Causation as influence.David Lewis - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):182-197.
Harm to Self.Joel Feinberg - 1986 - Oxford University Press USA.
Harm to Others.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - Oxford University Press USA.
Do I Make a Difference?Shelly Kagan - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (2):105-141.

View all 35 references / Add more references