Reply to an Objection to Animal Rights

Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (1):87-88 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Notwithstanding the numerous errors in this piece, the core teaching remains unscathed: Arithmetic (or any other branch of mathematics) cannot do moral work. If it appears otherwise, that simply means some nonstandard version of the relevant area of mathematics will work. -/- Negative results can indeed sometimes be shown using mathematics, but not on such fundamental normative questions as whether something/someone has rights. Also, mathematics can put into relief, sometimes, a fundamental normative question, even though it cannot resolve it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,583

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
112 (#201,177)

6 months
8 (#520,014)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reply to Fulda on animal rights.Michael Levin - 1993 - Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (1):111-112.
Vegetarianism Versus Environmentalism.David Bryant Waller - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references