Reaching targets in the national cervical screening programme: are current practices unethical?

Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (3):151-157 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The principle of informed consent is now well established within the National Health Service (NHS) in relation to any type of medical treatment. However, this ethical principle appears to be far less well established in relation to medical screening programmes such as Britain's national cervical screening programme. This article will critically examine the case for health care providers vigorously pursuing women to accept an invitation to be screened. It will discuss the type of information which women would need in order to make an informed decision about whether or not to be screened. The lack of such information in current patient leaflets on the "smear test" will then be documented. Finally, the article will explore possible ways of maximising women's autonomy in relation to the cervical screening programme without sacrificing any of its main benefits

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-maleficence and the ethics of consent to cancer screening.Lotte Elton - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):510-513.
Cervical Cancer Screening in India.Sandhya Srinivasan, Veena Johari & Amar Jesani - 2017 - In Doris Schroeder, Julie Cook, François Hirsch, Solveig Fenet & Vasantha Muthuswamy (eds.), Ethics Dumping: Case Studies from North-South Research Collaborations. New York: Springer. pp. 33-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
76 (#278,045)

6 months
17 (#179,757)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?