Responses to Quaestio

Quaestio 12:485-501 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I wish to illustrate realism’s position with regard to modern and contemporary philosophy and its transcendental turn. I will posit that new realism, while being very well aware of this turn , rejects it: in fact, from a realist perspective, the existence of ancestral beings, existing long before humans, proves that reality cannot be regarded as a correlate of human thought. I will therefore respectively refute the theories positing the dependency of reality on thought, arguing that the main problem with anti-realism stems from a twofold confusion: between ontology and epistemology on one side, and between natural objects and social objects on the other. Finally, I will dwell on the perspectives which today lie in the proposal of a positive realism

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Heidegger’s “Turn” a Realist Project?Markus Gabriel - 2014 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy:44-73.
New Realism as Positive Realism.Maurizio Ferraris - 2014 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy:172-213.
Kant's transcendental idealism and contemporary anti‐realism.Lucy Allais - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):369 – 392.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
18 (#1,123,254)

6 months
8 (#613,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maurizio Ferraris
Università degli Studi di Torino

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references