- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Rational Reconstruction of the L’Aquila Case: How Non-Denial Turns into Acceptance
Social Epistemology 33 (6):503-513 (2019)
Abstract
ABSTRACTIn 2009, an earthquake struck the city L’Aquila, causing more than 300 deaths and leading to a trial which lasted almost four years and – though cleared in the appeal – in which scientists...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial.Federico Brandmayr - 2017 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 42 (3):346-380.
Continuous Environmental Changes May Enhance Topographic Memory Skills. Evidence From L’Aquila Earthquake-Exposed Survivors.Laura Piccardi, Massimiliano Palmiero, Alessia Bocchi, Anna Maria Giannini, Maddalena Boccia, Francesca Baralla, Pierluigi Cordellieri & Simonetta D’Amico - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12:347392.
The ethics of earthquake prediction.Ayhan Sol & Halil Turan - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):655-666.
Einstein Vs. Bergson: An Enduring Quarrel on Time.Alessandra Campo & Simone Gozzano (eds.) - 2021 - Boston: De Gruyter.
Congressi e Convegni: Bruxelles, Amsterdam, L'Aquila, Torino.Augusto Guzzo - 1965 - Filosofia 16 (1):173.
Les entretiens de l'aquila sur « le fondement Des droits de l'homme ».Paul Arbousse-Bastide - 1965 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 20 (2):195 - 202.
Believing to Belong: Addressing the Novice-Expert Problem in Polarized Scientific Communication.Helen De Cruz - 2020 - Social Epistemology 34 (5):440-452.
Enrico Berti: Studi Aristotelici. (Methodos 7.) Pp. 363. L'Aquila: L. U. Japadre, 1975. Paper, L.5,000.Pamela M. Huby - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (2):290-290.
Consensus versus Unanimity: Which Carries More Weight?Finnur Dellsén - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-10-18
Downloads
32 (#709,290)
6 months
10 (#415,916)
2019-10-18
Downloads
32 (#709,290)
6 months
10 (#415,916)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Distributing epistemic and practical risks: a comparative study of communicating earthquake damages.Li-an Yu - 2022 - Synthese 360 (5):1-24.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-72rpk uwo