Axiomatizing Truth: How and Why

Abstract

2. Various philosophical and semantical theories are candidates for axiomatization (but not all, e.g. coherence, pragmatic, fuzzy theories). NB: axiomatizations are not uniquely determined

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

original Feferman, Solomon (2012) "Axiomatizing Truth: Why and How?". In Berger, Ulrich, Diener, Hannes, Schuster, Peter, Seisenberger, Monika, Logic, Construction, Computation, pp. 185-200: De Gruyter (2012)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Editorial Introduction.John Haldane - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):433-436.
Editorial Introduction.An Ravelingien - 2007 - Philosophica 79 (2):5-10.
Editorial Introduction.Jim Kincaid - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (2):27-40.
Editorial introduction.Gerard Greenway - 1999 - Angelaki 4 (3):133-134.
Editorial introduction.John Sellars - 2006 - Angelaki 11 (3):1 – 3.
Editorial introduction.Pelagia Goulimari - 2002 - Angelaki 7 (3):1 – 2.
Editorial Introduction.Sam Ashman - 2006 - Historical Materialism 14 (4):3-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-18

Downloads
78 (#267,786)

6 months
6 (#851,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Classicality Lost: K3 and LP after the Fall.Matthias Jenny - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):43-53.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reflecting on incompleteness.Solomon Feferman - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):1-49.
Axioms for determinateness and truth.Solomon Feferman - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (2):204-217.

Add more references