Rethinking the Enlightenment, or thinking the Enlightenment for the first time

Approaching Religion 1 (2):7-11 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his famous comment on Kant’s Was ist Aufklärung?, Foucault considers that the debate ‘for’ or ‘against’ the Enlightenment has no meaning as such, and calls for a new space of inquiry that would take into account our own determination, as subjects, by the Enlightenment, making it the object ofa new history, still to be written. Although this short text has been quoted over and over, it is still a sort of empty programme that does not overcome the antinomies of modern rationality. I would like to draw on one of Foucault’s most suggestive remarks, albeit in some ways enigmatic: ‘[m]any things in our experience convince us that the historical event of the Enlightenment did not make us mature adults, and we have not reached that stage yet.’ Starting from this statement, I would like to delineate the possibilities of a New Enlightenment, that would not be the first one made better, or rendered adequate to its original project, but that would take really seriously the potential reflexivity encrypted in the Aufklärung, redefining the legitimate use of reason and the fair distribution of knowledge in a ‘post-rationalist’ age. In order to contribute to the collective reflection, I will use my own ongoing research on two different, but not unrelated topics: the question of the public as it appears in the new ‘cultural public sphere’ and the sociological analysis of the rationalisation process.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Enlightenment and freedom.Jonathan Peterson - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 223-244.
Kant's politics of enlightenment.Ciaran Cronin - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (1):51-80.
What is Buddhist Enlightenment?Dale Stuart Wright - 2016 - Oxford University Press USA.
Kant’s Machiavellian Moment.Jay Foster - 2015 - Con-Textos Kantianos 1:238-260.
Foucault's apology.Daniel Touey - 1998 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28 (1):83–106.
Benedetto Croce and the problem of Enlightenment.Girolamo Imbruglia - 2010 - History of European Ideas 36 (1):101-111.
The Enlightenment on Stage: A Celebration of Two Critiques.Anton Heinrich Rennesland - 2022 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):166-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-08

Downloads
21 (#1,049,356)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Qu'est-ce qu'un philosophe français?: La vie sociale des concepts (1880-1980).Jean-Louis Fabiani - 2010 - [Paris]: Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.

Add more references